The UN commissioned Postol and another expert to investigate the sarin attacks and both their findings concluded that the Syrian Government could not have been responsible and it was in fact the opposition forces who were the only reasonable culprits available. So much for UN impartiality.
A widely touted U.N. report accusing the Syrian government of two chlorine-gas attacks relied on shaky evidence and brushed aside witness testimony that claimed some incidents were staged, reports Robert Parry.
United Nations investigators encountered evidence that alleged chemical weapons attacks by the Syrian military were staged by jihadist rebels and their supporters, but still decided to blame the government for two incidents in which chlorine was allegedly dispersed via improvised explosives dropped by helicopters.
In both cases, the Syrian government denied that it had any aircraft in the areas at the times of the purported attacks, but the U.N. team rejected that explanation with the curious argument that Syria failed to provide flight records to corroborate the absence of any flights. Yet, if there had been no flights, there would be no flight records.
The controversial map developed by Human Rights Watch and embraced by the New York…
View original post 2,079 more words